Skip navigation
Currently Being Moderated

Why VeSys 2.0?

Posted by Nigel on May 28, 2009 7:55:37 AM

A Moment of Reflection

We released VeSys 2.0 at the end of March, and when it came to preparing for our regular operations review I took the opportunity to ask Nuri (the Product Manager for VeSys) to put together a couple of slides describing the first 30 days of its life. There is a lot to be proud of but as I have a habit of saying to my team, it's the negatives that tell you what you need to do to be better.

 

First Things First

Our original goal was not for the first release to be instantly adopted by existing VeSys users (a loyal bunch, who quite rightly really like the product), we knew that to get all of the tweaks and tuning, as well as the migration tools required, would take a little longer to get into VeSys 2.0. So VeSys 2.0 was targeted at new users, but we made sure that it was very easy for VeSys Classic customers to get their hands on the new version and start giving us that all important feedback.

 

They have not disappointed! However, before we get to that I wanted to tell you a story about Apple (please, no groans from those that know me... it's relevant I promise!).

 

This Blog is not Sponsored by Apple but…

Apple have a product called iLife, you get it free when you buy a new Mac but you do have to buy upgrades that are released after you've bought your Mac. One of the key parts of the Suite is a tool called iMovie. It's a wonderful tool that allows Prosumers (highly skilled amateurs) to put together amazing family videos, and I've even used it for putting together the occasional product video. In 2008 Apple released a new version. In the words of Steve Jobs “completely replacing one of the key apps with something that takes it to a whole new level”. Although for new users (and given those users are probably new to Apple computers and OS X, and therefore in “Learning Mode”) there were no great shakes, what they saw probably made sense. For existing users the story was very different, and they expressed significant frustration and anger. What had Apple done? Well firstly, some of the features users were used to were gone. However more importantly, they had completely dropped the normal video editing convention of having an infinitely long timeline, for a new paradigm. For those of us who were long standing iMovie users, there were lots of things that didn’t make sense. Some of the changes didn’t even seem justifiable. Why would they do it this way for no tangible benefit?

 

Of course, the initial reaction softened over time, as we all learned the new interface. However, there were still missing features (no migration tools, old projects could be brought in as raw footage, but were no longer editable), together with a horde of smaller features that we had grown to depend on. Apple did listen, and a few weeks after the initial release, made the old iMovie available for download for those that had upgraded the overall suite, but wanted to stick with the old movie editor.

 

Roll forward to the next release of iLife… and iMovie takes center stage. The missing features were largely back in, all of the important ones anyway, but much more importantly for those of us who had been using the “Classic” version it was a real “I get it now” moment. The presentation wasn’t made by Steve himself, but instead by the engineer who had proposed the re-write, who had had The Big Idea. He took the stage and took the time to show that Apple had listened about the missing features, and they were there, but then when it to show how the new editing paradigm had been evolved… he demonstrated what had been his vision. Tasks that were previously not supported in the original version, were there. Things that had been hard, or very manual, were there and the re-write had enabled them to take the software in directions they simply could not have gone in before. I don’t use iMovie Classic anymore.

 

Change is Good

I’m sure you see where I have been going with this. Whilst our revolution is not in the editing paradigm, it is in the fundamental architecture of VeSys, and where we can take it in the future. It’s not that we couldn’t have done some of the things we will release in new versions without the replacement of VeSys, but they would have been dramatically harder to achieve. In fact out of the box VeSys 2.0 has drawn in customers that had previously rejected VeSys because of things that would have taken much longer than the entire development time of VeSys 2.0 to deliver.

 

For existing users for whom the benefit of VeSys 2.0 is not yet sufficient or obvious, you still have VeSys Classic. However, right now we are busily working on the migration tools, adding things that Classic did that 2.0 doesn’t (and trying to do them just that little bit better), and some other more immediate actions in order to respond to some of that negative feedback we received in the first 30 days.

 

I’m going to address some of that feedback in some subsequent blogs (I’ve gone on long enough today), and talk about the progress and timing of the migration tools (I don’t share Steve’s love of secrecy!), but for now… Thank you very much for all the feedback, we are listening, we are making changes in response, and please use this community to tell us what you think we need to know.

11,277 Views Tags: vesys, apple, vesys_2.0, vesys2, vesys_2


May 28, 2009 8:26 AM jacob_mathai jacob_mathai    says:

Nothing endures but change ; There's an app for that !

May 28, 2009 8:40 AM Joel_Pointon Joel_Pointon    says:

Hi Nigel,

 

From my point of view as an external user I don't ever remember seeing any communication suggesting that VeSys 2.0 was initially designed for new users, although this could be an oversight on my part as I don't tend to read the Mentor Graphics newsletters in detail I tend to skim.

 

Existing users like myself received only an e-mail from Martin O'Brien explaining the benefits of VeSys 2.0, I know many of the VeSys users very well and it is of no surprise to me that they have downloaded and installed the new version.  VeSys Users have always been quick to adopt new versions because they are keen to get the new functionality of the latest software, if I had to estimate I would say that 60% of customers would download and install the latest version within 1 week of a release notification (depending on the enhancements included or whether there was a schema change).

May 28, 2009 9:01 AM Nigel Nigel    says in response to Joel_Pointon:

I think that's a very fair comment Joel, it's something we didn't communicate outside clearly at all. I hope that through a number of different mechanisms (including this blog) we are going to do a better job in future. That said we absolutely want to encourage VeSys users to do just what you've suggested and start playing and learning.

 

As you say many are already doing that and I'm going to blog about some of the early feedback (both in the VeSys 2.0 section and other feedback that's come in by e-mail or face-to-face) soon.

May 28, 2009 12:24 PM Joel_Pointon Joel_Pointon    says in response to Nigel:

Whenever I have dealt with users migrating from other tools a commonly used phrase is...

 

"In the old tool I used to do this...how do I do it in the new tool?"

 

Do you think it would be useful to have a dedicated area on the community forum that explains how the common tasks differ between VeSys Classic and VeSys 2.0?

May 28, 2009 2:43 PM Nigel Nigel    says in response to Joel_Pointon:

I think that's a really good idea, and there are a couple of ways that we could do it with the community forums. I think what's really interesting about it is that it's not about the bigger tasks that often become the focus of migration efforts, but the every day steps that engineers follow every day.

May 29, 2009 2:46 AM Joel_Pointon Joel_Pointon    says in response to Nigel:

Yeah I agree, although the migration functionality is critical to move from one tool to another this is only a 'one off' task.  The real annoyance for users is not being able to do their day to day tasks that they were familiar with.

If you noticed I've already asked a few of these type of questions in the VeSys 2.0 folder because this was the exact problem I was experiencing.  I had a good idea VeSys 2.0 could do what I needed to but it was just done in a different way, this can be frustrating trying to find this process.  I appreciate there is the help area but still flipping between the help and the design tools every few minutes does get to be annoying.

May 29, 2009 2:41 PM Joel_Pointon Joel_Pointon    says in response to Nigel:

I have posted a few questions that a VeSys Classic user would likely want to know the answer to in VeSys 2.0, I have tagged them with vesys_vesys2 if you need to move them to a new folder.

May 29, 2009 2:48 PM Nigel Nigel    says in response to Joel_Pointon:

That's perfect Joel, we are also considering using Tag Groups, which would allow us to pick these kind of questions out of multiple forums and show them as a single group. Thank you very much for your contributions (and the questions!)

May 29, 2009 2:49 PM Nigel Nigel    says in response to Joel_Pointon:

I understand, I also wonder if when we have a decent "body" of these questions/answers that they might be usefully integrated into the IESD University shipped with VeSys 2.0.