AnsweredAssumed Answered

Missing Copper pour connection

Question asked by sms on Apr 25, 2018
Latest reply on Apr 25, 2018 by weston_beal

I am trying to analyze SI of my board (drawn in altium). What I have observed is that generic batch-mode simulations of the same board with and without copper pour generate same results with a lot crosstalk (~500mV) among the coupled nets. From this I am assuming that Hyperlynx is not using the pour as a ground during the simulations. Can someone please guide me if I am concluding it correctly and if yes how to overcome this problem?